Typical Workflows
1. Prodia’s closed-loop flow
Prodia is not a collection of isolated features. It is designed as a continuous path from question to action.
2. Three common workflows
Daily review workflow
| Step | User action | System output |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Query yesterday’s core indicators | Output, OEE, yield, anomaly summary |
| 2 | Ask which part moved the most | Line / process / equipment-level differences |
| 3 | Ask for the likely cause of the anomaly | Cause candidates, affected scope |
| 4 | Ask what to focus on today | Priority items and follow-up suggestions |
Exception handling workflow
| Step | User action | System output |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Notice a quality, fault, or takt anomaly | Affected object and time range |
| 2 | Trigger diagnosis | Ranked factors and comparison results |
| 3 | Continue asking | What to check first, who to involve, which period to inspect |
| 4 | Receive guidance | Investigation path, recommended actions, review direction |
Process optimization workflow
| Step | User action | System output |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Identify a bottleneck or quality fluctuation | Bottleneck station or process |
| 2 | Analyze trend and distribution | Pattern of variation, high-impact objects |
| 3 | Relate process and parameters | Optimization direction and key variables |
| 4 | Form improvement actions | Follow-up validation items and watch metrics |
3. Why this matters
- Faster: reduce the time from issue discovery to workable judgment
- More stable: reduce variation through standardized analytical paths
- More repeatable: let the workflow be reused instead of relying on individual memory